Difference between revisions of "Fake scandals/IRS"

From CWRE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(more or less finished; re-sorted news links to be oldest first)
(exploration of links from Doug Leins)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
* '''2014-09-01''' [http://dailycaller.com/2014/09/01/email-reveals-lois-lerner-ignored-political-expenditures-by-unions/?advD=1248,37360 Email Reveals Lois Lerner Ignored Political Expenditures By Unions] - the zombie lurches on
 
* '''2014-09-01''' [http://dailycaller.com/2014/09/01/email-reveals-lois-lerner-ignored-political-expenditures-by-unions/?advD=1248,37360 Email Reveals Lois Lerner Ignored Political Expenditures By Unions] - the zombie lurches on
 
* '''2014-09-02''' [http://www.hngn.com/articles/41089/20140902/irs-lerner-overlook-millions-dollars-political-expenditures-unions-order-benefit.htm IRS: Did Lerner Overlook Millions Of Dollars Of Political Expenditures By Unions In Order To Benefit Democrats?]: answer is probably "no", but as long as the public thinks it's "yes"...
 
* '''2014-09-02''' [http://www.hngn.com/articles/41089/20140902/irs-lerner-overlook-millions-dollars-political-expenditures-unions-order-benefit.htm IRS: Did Lerner Overlook Millions Of Dollars Of Political Expenditures By Unions In Order To Benefit Democrats?]: answer is probably "no", but as long as the public thinks it's "yes"...
 +
* '''2014-11-22''' [http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/article/2556522 30,000 missing emails from IRS' Lerner recovered]: how about that -- administration officials were able to recover data they had previously thought to be unreadable. This is competence at work. I wonder if there will turn out to be anything relevant in them.
 +
** "The agency first failed to disclose the loss to Congress and then tried to declare Lerner’s e-mails gone and lost forever. Once again it appears the IRS hasn't been straight with Congress and the American people." says Darrell Issa. Why is he assuming dishonesty here? Data recovery is a very tricky business.
 +
* '''2014-11-25''' [http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/do-irs-wh-share-taxpayer-data/article/2556640 Revealed: 2,500 new documents in IRS / W.H. harassment cases] ...probably none of which have anything relevant in them
 +
* '''2014-12-03'''
 +
** [http://www.hngn.com/articles/51671/20141203/white-house-irs-watchdog-refusing-release-leaked-taxpayer-documents-obama.htm White House, IRS Watchdog Refusing To Release Leaked Taxpayer Documents About Obama Administration's Role In IRS Scandal] - sourced entirely from the Daily Caller link below and the Washington Examiner on 11/25
 +
** [http://dailycaller.com/2014/12/03/obama-administration-refuses-to-release-documents-about-white-house-role-in-irs-scandal/ Obama Administration REFUSES To Release Documents About White House Role in IRS Scandal]: actually, they were seized by the lawyer for the inspector general, Gregory M. Miller -- but whatever.

Revision as of 02:05, 5 December 2014

Supposedly there was some kind of scandal about the IRS, under Obama, targeting Tea Party groups (but not liberal groups) for possible investigation, but it turns out not to be true.

The supposed scandal was widely reported in the media while the fact that it was untrue was widely ignored, as was the fact that the focus on Tea Party groups had been requested by none other than Republican Darrell Issa.

Quotes

  • "This is truly outrageous. And it contributes to the profound distrust that the American people have in government. It is absolutely chilling that the IRS was singling out conservative groups for extra review. And I think that it's very disappointing that the president hasn't personally condemned this and spoken out." -- Susan Collins (R-ME), 5/12
  • "The Tea Party people have known about this and were working on this. But they said – it was just some odd underlings out in Cincinnati who did this and there was no political motive whatever involved. Now the question is, how stupid do they think we are? Just imagine, Donna Brazile, if the George W. Bush administration had an IRS underling, he’s out in Cincinnati, of course, saying we’re going to target groups with the word 'progressive' in their title. We’d have all hell breaking loose." -- George Will, conservatroll, 5/12
  • "The fact is if you're doing something and it's wrong, it's illegal, it's the kind of thing that scares the American people to their core, when Americans are being targeted for audits based on their political beliefs, that needs to change." -- Darrell Issa (R-CA), right-wingnut and chairman of the House Committee on Oversight
  • "If in fact IRS personnel engaged in the kind of practices that have been reported on and were intentionally targeting conservative groups, then that’s outrageous. And there’s no place for it." -- Barack Obama, 5/14

Links

News