Difference between revisions of "Transnegation Roundup/2020/09"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
** "The trans cult is trying to erase women and take away single sex spaces." | ** "The trans cult is trying to erase women and take away single sex spaces." | ||
* {{show/tweet|Ellen91333928|1301110694008492033|2020-09-02 06:52|[...] She's explaining exactly what happened...and how she got into doing all she can to raise awareness of what's being done to women, to children by The Trans Cult.}} ([https://twitter.com/sally_hines/status/1301621539150934017 h/t] has a rebuttal thread) | * {{show/tweet|Ellen91333928|1301110694008492033|2020-09-02 06:52|[...] She's explaining exactly what happened...and how she got into doing all she can to raise awareness of what's being done to women, to children by The Trans Cult.}} ([https://twitter.com/sally_hines/status/1301621539150934017 h/t] has a rebuttal thread) | ||
+ | * {{show/tweet|BluskyeAllison|1301500534491316224|2020-09-03 08:41|1/ This has been one of the most depressing 24 hours I’ve ever had on Gender Critical Twitter. / To be clear: every woman & girl must know that their sex-based rights will disappear if they do not pay attention & join this struggle.}} | ||
+ | ** To someone not familiar with the vocabulary, this undoubtedly comes across as someone sincerely concerned about women's rights. The combination of "[[gender critical]]" plus "[[sex-based rights]]", however, is a pretty clear indication that she's talking about trans people. | ||
+ | ** The fact that she doesn't say anything ''overtly'' offensive, yet is also (if you know what she's talking about) clearly taking a strong stand against rights for trans people, leaves us with an intense feeling of being attacked and yet with nothing obvious to refute. {{flag/red|strategic ambiguity}} | ||
+ | ** The intense emotion expressed ("one of the most depressing 24 hours I’ve ever had", "rights will disappear if they do not pay attention & join this struggle") only adds to the sense of danger. | ||
+ | ** [https://twitter.com/Woozalia/status/1302221577312964608 My retweet] goes into a bit more depth. |
Revision as of 13:19, 5 September 2020
- 2020-09-02 numerous comments on 'Star Trek: Discovery' Makes Franchise History With First Trans, Non-Binary Characters (archive.org has some which were removed)
- "In space is the best place for transickos / Off this planet Is a start. / Vile things."
- "Star Trek has been completely taken over by these freaks."
- "Can we get some decent scripts instead of trans propaganda?"
- "It’s ironic that these two nuts are on a science fiction show because science supports neither one of them." -- except it does
- "The trans cult is trying to erase women and take away single sex spaces."
- 2020-09-02 06:52 @Ellen91333928 “[...] She's explaining exactly what happened...and how she got into doing all she can to raise awareness of what's being done to women, to children by The Trans Cult.” (h/t has a rebuttal thread)
- 2020-09-03 08:41 @BluskyeAllison “1/ This has been one of the most depressing 24 hours I’ve ever had on Gender Critical Twitter. / To be clear: every woman & girl must know that their sex-based rights will disappear if they do not pay attention & join this struggle.”
- To someone not familiar with the vocabulary, this undoubtedly comes across as someone sincerely concerned about women's rights. The combination of "gender critical" plus "sex-based rights", however, is a pretty clear indication that she's talking about trans people.
- The fact that she doesn't say anything overtly offensive, yet is also (if you know what she's talking about) clearly taking a strong stand against rights for trans people, leaves us with an intense feeling of being attacked and yet with nothing obvious to refute. strategic ambiguity
- The intense emotion expressed ("one of the most depressing 24 hours I’ve ever had", "rights will disappear if they do not pay attention & join this struggle") only adds to the sense of danger.
- My retweet goes into a bit more depth.