Difference between revisions of "Myths/Democrats had a supermajority for two years"
< Myths
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(saving work) |
(done now, I think) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | {{hdr/myth|The Democrats had a supermajority in both houses of Congress for two years (2009-2011).}} | |
| − | {{hdr/myth|The Democrats had a supermajority in both houses of Congress for two years.}} | ||
==Myth== | ==Myth== | ||
===Examples=== | ===Examples=== | ||
| Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
* "For two years, [Obama] had complete, unadulterated control of the federal government, a 60 seat majority in the Senate, an 60 plus seat majority in the House. He got every – literally every – piece of legislation he wanted to try and quote turn around the economy..." — Representative {{l/wp|Aaron Schock}} (R-IL)<ref name=sdfp /> | * "For two years, [Obama] had complete, unadulterated control of the federal government, a 60 seat majority in the Senate, an 60 plus seat majority in the House. He got every – literally every – piece of legislation he wanted to try and quote turn around the economy..." — Representative {{l/wp|Aaron Schock}} (R-IL)<ref name=sdfp /> | ||
==Reality== | ==Reality== | ||
| + | The Democrats had, at ''most'', '''sixty days of effective supermajority''' – all hampered by short sessions and a terminally ill Senator who missed most of his votes. | ||
===Timeline=== | ===Timeline=== | ||
| + | When the 111<sup>th</sup> Congress convened, two Democratic seats were unfilled: | ||
| + | * The victory of Al Franken (D) over Norm Coleman (R) was in dispute; Coleman continued to occupy the seat. | ||
| + | * The seat formerly filled by Barack Obama was awaiting an appointed successor. | ||
| + | |||
| + | On top of that, Democratic Senator Ted Kennedy was terminally ill, and his presence could not be counted on. | ||
{| | {| | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | ! Date !! Event | + | ! Date !! Event !! Senate<br>Headcount |
|- | |- | ||
|'''2009-01-03''' | |'''2009-01-03''' | ||
| − | | | + | |111<sup>th</sup> US Congress officially convenes, with one Dem seat unoccupied and one filled by a Republican |
| − | + | | D:57 | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | | D: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''2009-01-15''' | |'''2009-01-15''' | ||
|Roland Burris is sworn in to fill Obama's seat | |Roland Burris is sworn in to fill Obama's seat | ||
| − | | | + | | D:58 |
| − | | D: | + | |
| + | |- | ||
| + | |'''2009-04-??''' | ||
| + | |Democratic Senator Ted Kennedy's illness prevents him from attending anymore | ||
| + | | D:58 -K | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''2009-04-28''' | |'''2009-04-28''' | ||
| − | |Senator Arlen Specter switches from Republican to Democrat | + | |Senator Arlen Specter switches from Republican to Democrat |
| − | + | | D:59 -K | |
| − | | D: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| − | |'''2009- | + | |'''2009-07-07''' |
|Franken is sworn in | |Franken is sworn in | ||
| − | + | | D:60 -K | |
| − | | D: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''2009-09-24''' | |'''2009-09-24''' | ||
|An interim successor to the recently-deceased Democratic Senator Edward Kennedy is appointed | |An interim successor to the recently-deceased Democratic Senator Edward Kennedy is appointed | ||
| − | | | + | | D:60 |
| − | | D: | + | |
| + | |- | ||
| + | |'''2009-10-09''' | ||
| + | |Senate officially adjourns for 2009, but there are 38 more days of special sessions. | ||
| + | | D:60 | ||
| + | |||
| + | |- | ||
| + | |'''2010-01-05''' | ||
| + | |Senate reconvenes for 2010. | ||
| + | | D:60 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|'''2010-02-04''' | |'''2010-02-04''' | ||
| − | |Republican [[Scott Brown]] joins the Senate after a special election, replacing Democrat Paul G. Kirk | + | |Republican [[Scott Brown]] joins the Senate after a special election, replacing Democrat Paul G. Kirk |
| − | |||
| D:59 | | D:59 | ||
|} | |} | ||
| − | + | Because of these circumstances, the Democrats only had an official supermajority from June 30 through February 4 – but even that was marred by the fact that Ted Kennedy was terminally ill with a brain tumor, and had ceased attending two months earlier.<ref name=factleft /> During his last month in the Senate, Kennedy only voted four times.<ref name=govtrack-k /> | |
| + | |||
| + | The Dems only had an actual ''present'' supermajority of 60 from 9/24 to 2/4. | ||
| + | |||
| + | During that time, there were 11 regular work days and 36 days of special sessions in 2009, and 13 regular work days in 2010:<ref name=factleft /> | ||
| − | + | * '''2009''': | |
| + | ** '''September 24 - October 9''': '''11 work days''' | ||
| + | ** '''Special sessions''': | ||
| + | *** '''October''': 13-15, 20-22, 27, 29 = '''8 work days''' | ||
| + | *** '''November''': 2, 4, 5, 9, 16, 17, 19, 21 = '''8 work days''' | ||
| + | *** '''December''': 1, 3-8, 10-13, 15-18, 19, 21-24 = '''20 work days''' | ||
| + | * '''2010''': | ||
| + | ** '''January 5 - February 4''': '''13 work days''' | ||
| − | * | + | To add to the Dems' troubles: |
| − | + | * Democratic Senatory Robert Byrd was also terminally ill. During the 61-vote stretch (60 without Kennedy) of 6/30-2/4, Byrd missed most of his votes as well, leaving the Dems with only 59 reliable votes even during these 60 days.<ref name=govtrack-b /> The Dems arguably ''never'' had a functional supermajority; they certainly never had one that was dependable, necessitating extra time to try and drum up Republican support before going to a vote. | |
| + | * The 60 days of supermajority were split into short sessions, none of which was longer than five days. | ||
| + | * The special session time (28 of those 60 days) was entirely devoted to budget issues and Republican amendments to the ACA. | ||
| − | + | Given the slow pace at which things are accomplished in the Senate, this was nowhere near enough to push through any major accomplishments – much less reverse '''six years''' of [[Republican Party/small government|Republican "small government"]] mismanagement. | |
| + | Nonetheless, the Democrats did not waste what little time they had. [[issuepedia:Obamacare|The ACA]] – a signature piece of Democratic legislation (albeit significantly compromised by Republican demands) – was the major item of business during this time, and was signed only one month after the Democrats lost their supermajority. | ||
| + | ==Links== | ||
| + | ===Reference=== | ||
| + | * Wikipedia: {{l/wp|111th United States Congress}} | ||
==Footnotes== | ==Footnotes== | ||
<references> | <references> | ||
| + | <ref name=factleft>'''2012-01-31''' [http://factleft.com/2012/01/31/the-myth-of-democratic-super-majority/ The Myth of Democratic Super Majority]</ref> | ||
<ref name=sdfp>'''2012-09-11''' [http://sandiegofreepress.org/2012/09/the-myth-of-the-filibuster-proof-democratic-senate/ The Myth of the Filibuster-Proof Democratic Senate]</ref> | <ref name=sdfp>'''2012-09-11''' [http://sandiegofreepress.org/2012/09/the-myth-of-the-filibuster-proof-democratic-senate/ The Myth of the Filibuster-Proof Democratic Senate]</ref> | ||
| − | <ref name=govtrack>govtrack.us: [https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/edward_kennedy/300059 Sen. Edward “Ted” Kennedy (D)]</ref> | + | <ref name=govtrack-k>govtrack.us: [https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/edward_kennedy/300059 Sen. Edward “Ted” Kennedy (D)]</ref> |
| + | <ref name=govtrack-b>govtrack.us: [https://www.govtrack.us/congress/members/robert_byrd/300016 Sen. Robert Byrd (D)]</ref> | ||
</references> | </references> | ||
Revision as of 01:49, 18 June 2015
| Myth: The Democrats had a supermajority in both houses of Congress for two years (2009-2011). |
Myth
Examples
- "But in fairness, the first two years, [Obama] had a filibuster-proof majority in the Senate and a big majority in the House." — Chris Wallace, Fox News[1]
- "For two years, [Obama] had complete, unadulterated control of the federal government, a 60 seat majority in the Senate, an 60 plus seat majority in the House. He got every – literally every – piece of legislation he wanted to try and quote turn around the economy..." — Representative Aaron Schock (R-IL)[1]
Reality
The Democrats had, at most, sixty days of effective supermajority – all hampered by short sessions and a terminally ill Senator who missed most of his votes.
Timeline
When the 111th Congress convened, two Democratic seats were unfilled:
- The victory of Al Franken (D) over Norm Coleman (R) was in dispute; Coleman continued to occupy the seat.
- The seat formerly filled by Barack Obama was awaiting an appointed successor.
On top of that, Democratic Senator Ted Kennedy was terminally ill, and his presence could not be counted on.
| Date | Event | Senate Headcount |
|---|---|---|
| 2009-01-03 | 111th US Congress officially convenes, with one Dem seat unoccupied and one filled by a Republican | D:57 |
| 2009-01-15 | Roland Burris is sworn in to fill Obama's seat | D:58 |
| 2009-04-?? | Democratic Senator Ted Kennedy's illness prevents him from attending anymore | D:58 -K |
| 2009-04-28 | Senator Arlen Specter switches from Republican to Democrat | D:59 -K |
| 2009-07-07 | Franken is sworn in | D:60 -K |
| 2009-09-24 | An interim successor to the recently-deceased Democratic Senator Edward Kennedy is appointed | D:60 |
| 2009-10-09 | Senate officially adjourns for 2009, but there are 38 more days of special sessions. | D:60 |
| 2010-01-05 | Senate reconvenes for 2010. | D:60 |
| 2010-02-04 | Republican Scott Brown joins the Senate after a special election, replacing Democrat Paul G. Kirk | D:59 |
Because of these circumstances, the Democrats only had an official supermajority from June 30 through February 4 – but even that was marred by the fact that Ted Kennedy was terminally ill with a brain tumor, and had ceased attending two months earlier.[2] During his last month in the Senate, Kennedy only voted four times.[3]
The Dems only had an actual present supermajority of 60 from 9/24 to 2/4.
During that time, there were 11 regular work days and 36 days of special sessions in 2009, and 13 regular work days in 2010:[2]
- 2009:
- September 24 - October 9: 11 work days
- Special sessions:
- October: 13-15, 20-22, 27, 29 = 8 work days
- November: 2, 4, 5, 9, 16, 17, 19, 21 = 8 work days
- December: 1, 3-8, 10-13, 15-18, 19, 21-24 = 20 work days
- 2010:
- January 5 - February 4: 13 work days
To add to the Dems' troubles:
- Democratic Senatory Robert Byrd was also terminally ill. During the 61-vote stretch (60 without Kennedy) of 6/30-2/4, Byrd missed most of his votes as well, leaving the Dems with only 59 reliable votes even during these 60 days.[4] The Dems arguably never had a functional supermajority; they certainly never had one that was dependable, necessitating extra time to try and drum up Republican support before going to a vote.
- The 60 days of supermajority were split into short sessions, none of which was longer than five days.
- The special session time (28 of those 60 days) was entirely devoted to budget issues and Republican amendments to the ACA.
Given the slow pace at which things are accomplished in the Senate, this was nowhere near enough to push through any major accomplishments – much less reverse six years of Republican "small government" mismanagement.
Nonetheless, the Democrats did not waste what little time they had. The ACA – a signature piece of Democratic legislation (albeit significantly compromised by Republican demands) – was the major item of business during this time, and was signed only one month after the Democrats lost their supermajority.
Links
Reference
- Wikipedia: 111th United States Congress
Footnotes
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 2012-09-11 The Myth of the Filibuster-Proof Democratic Senate
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 2012-01-31 The Myth of Democratic Super Majority
- ↑ govtrack.us: Sen. Edward “Ted” Kennedy (D)
- ↑ govtrack.us: Sen. Robert Byrd (D)