Difference between revisions of "Woozle/2022/02/17/1"

From CWRE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
[https://nextdoor.com/p/q_T9J2WxWbxy/c/730151979 2022-02-15], a comment compares Ford's liability for making a car which was used to kill someone with Remington's liability for making a gun which was used to kill someone: {{fmt/quote|We have to stop car violence.}}
+
[https://nextdoor.com/p/q_T9J2WxWbxy/c/730151979 2022-02-15]: a comment compares Ford's liability for making a car which was used to kill someone with Remington's liability for making a gun which was used to kill someone: {{fmt/quote|We have to stop car violence.}}
  
 
How many times does it need to be pointed out that this is what driver's licenses are for, and that if gun licenses were treated with the same level of seriousness as driver's licenses, we probably wouldn't be arguing about this?
 
How many times does it need to be pointed out that this is what driver's licenses are for, and that if gun licenses were treated with the same level of seriousness as driver's licenses, we probably wouldn't be arguing about this?
  
 
...even though cars are much more necessary for survival in many US places than guns are, and therefore guns should probably be ''more'' heavily regulated.
 
...even though cars are much more necessary for survival in many US places than guns are, and therefore guns should probably be ''more'' heavily regulated.
 +
 +
[https://nextdoor.com/p/q_T9J2WxWbxy/c/730235570 2022-02-15]: another comment notes that {{fmt/quote|Guns don’t shoot themselves.}}
 +
 +
Yes. Guns don't kill people -- people kill people. This is why we need to keep guns away from people. (...but also no, sometimes they do shoot themselves. They're dangerous, no matter how you slice it.)
 +
 +
Also, Scott says {{fmt/quote|Is "dumb on Remington's part" code for "inconvenient for the lib-owning gun nut narrative"?}} but BK clearly misinterprets this as somehow calling him a lib, which it obviously isn't.

Revision as of 02:05, 16 February 2022

2022-02-15: a comment compares Ford's liability for making a car which was used to kill someone with Remington's liability for making a gun which was used to kill someone: «We have to stop car violence.»

How many times does it need to be pointed out that this is what driver's licenses are for, and that if gun licenses were treated with the same level of seriousness as driver's licenses, we probably wouldn't be arguing about this?

...even though cars are much more necessary for survival in many US places than guns are, and therefore guns should probably be more heavily regulated.

2022-02-15: another comment notes that «Guns don’t shoot themselves.»

Yes. Guns don't kill people -- people kill people. This is why we need to keep guns away from people. (...but also no, sometimes they do shoot themselves. They're dangerous, no matter how you slice it.)

Also, Scott says «Is "dumb on Remington's part" code for "inconvenient for the lib-owning gun nut narrative"?» but BK clearly misinterprets this as somehow calling him a lib, which it obviously isn't.