Difference between revisions of "Transnegation Roundup/2020/08/14"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "{{show/tweet|ClaireLoneragan|1294226706526601216|06:57|Remember Julie Marshall? https://bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lancashire-53410019 @BBCNews / say they reported the case as...") |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Just because she's criminally problematic doesn't mean she's not a woman. Did we revoke Squeaky Fromme's womanhood, or Patty Hearst's, or...? | Just because she's criminally problematic doesn't mean she's not a woman. Did we revoke Squeaky Fromme's womanhood, or Patty Hearst's, or...? | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{show/tweet|bjportraits|1294296090095824901|11:33|[retweet of] A male-bodied person, however kind, professional and blameless, can be traumatising to a woman or child who has been the victim of male violence. / Patients have the right to say no.}} | ||
Revision as of 18:56, 14 August 2020
06:57 @ClaireLoneragan “Remember Julie Marshall? https://bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lancashire-53410019 @BBCNews / say they reported the case as if Julie Marshall was actually a woman because the court made no mention of trans status.”
Again, they're acting as if "trans women aren't really women" is a proven thing, when the opposite is true.
Just because she's criminally problematic doesn't mean she's not a woman. Did we revoke Squeaky Fromme's womanhood, or Patty Hearst's, or...?
11:33 @bjportraits “[retweet of] A male-bodied person, however kind, professional and blameless, can be traumatising to a woman or child who has been the victim of male violence. / Patients have the right to say no.”