Transnegation Roundup/2020/08/04

From CWRE
< Transnegation Roundup‎ | 2020/08
Revision as of 00:48, 10 August 2020 by Woozle (talk | contribs) (Created page with "=Transnegation Roundup for Tuesday, August 4, 2020= ==Misrepresentation== ==Cis is a slur== '''[https://twitter.com/wendycockcroft/status/1290586827188047872 05:54 @wendycockc...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Transnegation Roundup for Tuesday, August 4, 2020

Misrepresentation

Cis is a slur

05:54 @wendycockcroft reshares I don't misgender or fail to use preferred descriptors, etc., in my dealings with trans people. Even so, saying that a woman is an adult human female gets me called a bigot.

Nope. Nobody says that. I've seen this claim several times, and it's ridiculous.

She may be covertly redefining "female" to mean "cis female", but she needs to say that -- which is why it's so important to have disambiguators like that in conversations like this.

This was a reshare of a tweet from Monday:

21:31 @BlairJ640 There are people in my mentions calling me all kinds of nasty names and forcing the label ‘cis’ on me, but if I don’t respect and use a transperson’s preferred pronouns, I’m a bigot? Go figure.

Yes. Because it's not the same thing. "Cis" is a technical term, and "gender critical" advocates persistently refuse to definitively offer any alternatives. They will frequently use misleading terms like biological sex or birth sex (and gender-specific variants), but they have also argued that using these terms -- or any terms -- to distinguish between cis and trans people is problematic, for reasons that make no sense.

(in progress)

https://differently-normal.com/2020/06/10/example-post-3/ - CAIS woman supporting JKR, long essay worth responding to?