Difference between revisions of "So what/if/federal debt is now at an all-time high"
m (Woozle moved page Myths/federal debt is now at an all-time high to Irrelevancies/federal debt is now at an all-time high: more accurate classification) |
m (Woozle moved page Irrelevancies/federal debt is now at an all-time high to So what/if/federal debt is now at an all-time high: better term / root page) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[category:deficit]] | [[category:deficit]] | ||
| + | [[category:budget]] | ||
| + | {{hdr/irrelevant|Government debt is at an all-time record high.}} | ||
{{nav/budget crisis}} | {{nav/budget crisis}} | ||
| − | + | ==Claim== | |
| − | + | The current US federal debt is at a record high which is highly unusual and entirely the fault of [[Myths/Obama/federal budget|President Obama]] and/or [[Myths/liberal policies put us more in debt|liberal policies]]. | |
===Example=== | ===Example=== | ||
* "a record natl debt (obuma has added $8 TRILLION to the natl debt and his annual budget adds $1/2 TRILLION TO IT EVERY YEAR. OH BY THE WAY...THIS IS FAR LEFT RADICAL REGRESSIVE SOCIALIST LIBERAL DEMOCRAT ECONOMIC POLICY. SO UNDER THE DEMOCRATS WE DONT HAVE AN ECONOMY WE HAVE GOVT SLAVERY." - [https://plus.google.com/u/0/+JasonEasleyPoliticusUSA/posts/YQZ4P8ph1rT Google+, 2014-12-03] | * "a record natl debt (obuma has added $8 TRILLION to the natl debt and his annual budget adds $1/2 TRILLION TO IT EVERY YEAR. OH BY THE WAY...THIS IS FAR LEFT RADICAL REGRESSIVE SOCIALIST LIBERAL DEMOCRAT ECONOMIC POLICY. SO UNDER THE DEMOCRATS WE DONT HAVE AN ECONOMY WE HAVE GOVT SLAVERY." - [https://plus.google.com/u/0/+JasonEasleyPoliticusUSA/posts/YQZ4P8ph1rT Google+, 2014-12-03] | ||
==Reality== | ==Reality== | ||
This is essentially a meaningless statement as long as there remains a ''deficit'' rather than a ''surplus'', which has been the case almost continuously since {{l/ip|Ronald Reagan}} first exploded the national debt in the early 1980s. A "deficit", by definition, means that the debt is higher than before; as long as there is always a deficit, then the debt each year will always be at a "record high". | This is essentially a meaningless statement as long as there remains a ''deficit'' rather than a ''surplus'', which has been the case almost continuously since {{l/ip|Ronald Reagan}} first exploded the national debt in the early 1980s. A "deficit", by definition, means that the debt is higher than before; as long as there is always a deficit, then the debt each year will always be at a "record high". | ||
| + | |||
| + | While it's probably not a good thing for the debt to be so high, with no likelihood of reduction anytime in the forecastable future, the blame for it is being completely (and no doubt deliberately) misplaced. If anyone should be blamed for starting this trend, it would be Reagan – although Bush II was clearly borrowing from Reagan's playbook. | ||
===Clinton Surplus=== | ===Clinton Surplus=== | ||
| + | [[File:405875 2404492924164 601932573 n Tax-and-Spend liberal.jpg|thumb|Spot the Tax-And-Spend Liberal]] | ||
The one brief pause in this trend was the surplus during Bill Clinton's administration, which is just one of many data points adding to the conclusion that [[liberal policies are fiscally conservative]] and [[Democrats manage money better than Republicans]]. The primary reason for this is that [[Republican]]s and [[conservatroll]]s refuse to raise taxes -- especially on the rich -- in order to pay for their various pet projects (mainly wars and tax cuts for the rich). | The one brief pause in this trend was the surplus during Bill Clinton's administration, which is just one of many data points adding to the conclusion that [[liberal policies are fiscally conservative]] and [[Democrats manage money better than Republicans]]. The primary reason for this is that [[Republican]]s and [[conservatroll]]s refuse to raise taxes -- especially on the rich -- in order to pay for their various pet projects (mainly wars and tax cuts for the rich). | ||
Unfortunately, the Clinton surplus was not large enough or long-lived enough to significantly reduce the deficit, and the national debt resumed its climb to new "record highs" as soon as {{l/ip|George W. Bush}} took office. | Unfortunately, the Clinton surplus was not large enough or long-lived enough to significantly reduce the deficit, and the national debt resumed its climb to new "record highs" as soon as {{l/ip|George W. Bush}} took office. | ||
Latest revision as of 20:47, 2 November 2020
| Irrelevant Comment: “Government debt is at an all-time record high.” |
| Budget Crisis Propaganda |
Claim
The current US federal debt is at a record high which is highly unusual and entirely the fault of President Obama and/or liberal policies.
Example
- "a record natl debt (obuma has added $8 TRILLION to the natl debt and his annual budget adds $1/2 TRILLION TO IT EVERY YEAR. OH BY THE WAY...THIS IS FAR LEFT RADICAL REGRESSIVE SOCIALIST LIBERAL DEMOCRAT ECONOMIC POLICY. SO UNDER THE DEMOCRATS WE DONT HAVE AN ECONOMY WE HAVE GOVT SLAVERY." - Google+, 2014-12-03
Reality
This is essentially a meaningless statement as long as there remains a deficit rather than a surplus, which has been the case almost continuously since Ronald Reagan first exploded the national debt in the early 1980s. A "deficit", by definition, means that the debt is higher than before; as long as there is always a deficit, then the debt each year will always be at a "record high".
While it's probably not a good thing for the debt to be so high, with no likelihood of reduction anytime in the forecastable future, the blame for it is being completely (and no doubt deliberately) misplaced. If anyone should be blamed for starting this trend, it would be Reagan – although Bush II was clearly borrowing from Reagan's playbook.
Clinton Surplus
The one brief pause in this trend was the surplus during Bill Clinton's administration, which is just one of many data points adding to the conclusion that liberal policies are fiscally conservative and Democrats manage money better than Republicans. The primary reason for this is that Republicans and conservatrolls refuse to raise taxes -- especially on the rich -- in order to pay for their various pet projects (mainly wars and tax cuts for the rich).
Unfortunately, the Clinton surplus was not large enough or long-lived enough to significantly reduce the deficit, and the national debt resumed its climb to new "record highs" as soon as George W. Bush took office.