So what/if/everyone is entitled to an opinion
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Irrelevant Comment: “everyone is entitled to their own opinion” |
About
The implied argument here is that you shouldn't be criticizing someone because they're just expressing an opinion, which is something they're entitled to do. While we often accept it as a truism in the sense that it is asserting freedom of speech, it is also often used maliciously to shut down valid counterarguments by equating them to "opinions". When used that way, it is the third-person-defending version of opinion equivocation, a logical fallacy.
Example
- A comment on Nextdoor in response to criticisms of NC Lieutenant Governor Mark Robinson's bigoted comments about the "LGBTQ lifestyle":
- "The man is entitled to his opinion. Just because you don't agree doesn’t matter, it's his opinion. And the continued put downs do nothing to help your stance ever."
Reality
At its best, this kind of statement is just a way of asserting that nobody has the right to stop people thinking and saying whatever they want, which is the essence of free speech.
The problem arises when:
- The "opinion" is about a matter of verifiable fact, or about actions which they are advocating.
- The speaker is in a position of power, where their opinions may shape policy that affects others.
- The speaker has a platform, where many people will be influenced by their opinion.
Further Reading
- 2012-10-04 No, you’re not entitled to your opinion: "if 'entitled to an opinion' means 'entitled to have your views treated as serious candidates for the truth' then it’s pretty clearly false."