Difference between revisions of "Republican Party"

From CWRE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎News Items: several more from Indy)
(→‎News Items: 7/3 post)
 
Line 64: Line 64:
 
* '''2015-06-03''' [http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/north-carolinas-solar-industry-is-booming-so-why-are-state-republicans-threatening-to-strangle-it/Content?oid=4475291 North Carolina's solar industry is booming. So why are state Republicans threatening to strangle it?]
 
* '''2015-06-03''' [http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/north-carolinas-solar-industry-is-booming-so-why-are-state-republicans-threatening-to-strangle-it/Content?oid=4475291 North Carolina's solar industry is booming. So why are state Republicans threatening to strangle it?]
 
* '''2015-06-24''' [http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/north-carolina-legislature-could-gut-lake-river-protections/Content North Carolina Legislature could gut lake, river protections]: Republicans prefer profits over a healthy and aesthetic environment
 
* '''2015-06-24''' [http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/north-carolina-legislature-could-gut-lake-river-protections/Content North Carolina Legislature could gut lake, river protections]: Republicans prefer profits over a healthy and aesthetic environment
 +
* '''2015-07-03''' [https://plus.google.com/u/0/+PamelaZuppo/posts/Mp4sGvjX1DP Republicans on the House Appropriations Committee added riders to a spending bill that would limit the White House’s ability to require contractor disclosure] and other things. This post needs to be combed for specifics and sources.
  
 
==Positives==
 
==Positives==

Latest revision as of 14:08, 6 July 2015

seedling article
This article is incomplete. It might be useful as a reference, but avoid offering it as a definitive presentation. Sources are needed.

Negatives

  • make the most noise about fiscal responsibility, but implement irresponsible fiscal policy.
    • want to spend more money on wars
      • ...but not interested in paying for said wars through raised taxes
      • ...but not interested in taking care of the veterans of said wars
  • use small government arguments to get what they want while actually making government more oppressive
  • favor private wealth-concentration over conservation of common wealth
  • oppose funding for:
    • public education
    • public health
    • public safety
  • endorse religion as a basis for governance (dominionism); anti-secular
  • take many positions that cannot be defended rationally (typically for religious reasons):
    • anti-science
    • against sex education
    • against easy access to contraceptives
    • against bodily autonomy for women
    • favor racial profiling over more accurate methods of identifying criminals
    • oppose any kind of marriage or sexual relations except heterosexual
      • formerly used many of the same (bad) arguments to defend opposition to "interracial" marriages
  • favor authoritarian, top-down society with high inequality
    • pro-patriarchy
    • pro-plutonomy:
      • embrace the idea of selling principles to the highest bidder
      • against income taxation, especially of the wealthy and large businesses (i.e. the major funders of their campaigns)
    • tend to believe the "just world" fallacy
    • unsympathetic to those in need
  • originated and support the "war on terror"
  • originated and support the "war on drugs"
  • high level of tribalism (draw sharp line between "us" and "them"; expect unquestioning loyalty to "us")
  • supported the Wall Street bailout actually, it looks like more Democrats voted for this
  • 2010: after complaining that action on a small-business jobs bill was taking too long, Republicans effectively blocked passage of the bill when it was up for a vote.

Pages

News Items

Positives

CWRE is seeking input regarding positive aspects of the Republican Party versus other parties. We are not aware of any at this time.

Links

Notes

There was considerable back-and-forth regarding criticism of the above points in comments here; these should probably be mapped out somewhere.