Difference between revisions of "Republican Party"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(dominionism linkdrop) |
(Oatmeal) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
===News Items=== | ===News Items=== | ||
* '''2014-11-10''' [https://twitter.com/SenTedCruz/status/531834493922189313 Tweet]: ""Net Neutrality" is Obamacare for the Internet; the Internet should not operate at the speed of government." Implies that Obamacare is slow and inefficient; implies that net neutrality will slow down the internet. False on both counts (although lack of net neutrality would make it possible for elites to purchase faster speed for their sites -- which would be consistent with the Republican view that {{l/sub|only elites matter}}.) | * '''2014-11-10''' [https://twitter.com/SenTedCruz/status/531834493922189313 Tweet]: ""Net Neutrality" is Obamacare for the Internet; the Internet should not operate at the speed of government." Implies that Obamacare is slow and inefficient; implies that net neutrality will slow down the internet. False on both counts (although lack of net neutrality would make it possible for elites to purchase faster speed for their sites -- which would be consistent with the Republican view that {{l/sub|only elites matter}}.) | ||
| + | ** [http://theoatmeal.com/blog/net_neutrality The Oatmeal] helpfully explains [[net neutrality]] to SenTedCruz. | ||
* '''2014-11-09''' | * '''2014-11-09''' | ||
** [http://aattp.org/navy-appoints-first-ever-atheist-as-a-lay-leader-right-wing-freakout-ensues Navy Appoints First Ever Atheist Lay Leader, Right Wing Freakout Ensues] "Republicans on the House Armed Services Committee objected strenuously saying that a secular humanist chaplain would make a mockery of the chaplaincy and denigrate religious soldiers and their families." -- an expression of [[dominionism]] | ** [http://aattp.org/navy-appoints-first-ever-atheist-as-a-lay-leader-right-wing-freakout-ensues Navy Appoints First Ever Atheist Lay Leader, Right Wing Freakout Ensues] "Republicans on the House Armed Services Committee objected strenuously saying that a secular humanist chaplain would make a mockery of the chaplaincy and denigrate religious soldiers and their families." -- an expression of [[dominionism]] | ||
Revision as of 13:03, 11 November 2014
Negatives
- anti-science
- support global warming denial
- endorse religion as a basis for governance (dominionism); anti-secular
- against sex education
- against easy access to contraceptives
- against bodily autonomy for women
- pro-patriarchy
- favor authoritarian, top-down society with high inequality
- favor racial profiling over more accurate methods of identifying criminals
- originated and support the "war on terror"
- originated and support the "war on drugs"
- unsympathetic to those in need, believing they deserve their situation
- high level of tribalism (draw sharp line between "us" and "them"; expect unquestioning loyalty to "us")
News Items
- 2014-11-10 Tweet: ""Net Neutrality" is Obamacare for the Internet; the Internet should not operate at the speed of government." Implies that Obamacare is slow and inefficient; implies that net neutrality will slow down the internet. False on both counts (although lack of net neutrality would make it possible for elites to purchase faster speed for their sites -- which would be consistent with the Republican view that only elites matter.)
- The Oatmeal helpfully explains net neutrality to SenTedCruz.
- 2014-11-09
- Navy Appoints First Ever Atheist Lay Leader, Right Wing Freakout Ensues "Republicans on the House Armed Services Committee objected strenuously saying that a secular humanist chaplain would make a mockery of the chaplaincy and denigrate religious soldiers and their families." -- an expression of dominionism
- Ted Cruz Threatens To Block Attorney General Nominee: Republicans threaten to block Attorney General nominee over non-existent problem
- 2014-10-22 GOP mailer attacking Elizabeth Warren on TARP bailout misleading: Warren did not endorse the Wall Street bailout; she criticized it.
Positives
CWRE is seeking input regarding positive aspects of the Republican Party versus other parties. We are not aware of any at this time.