Difference between revisions of "Republican Party"

From CWRE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎News Items: linkdrop)
(→‎News Items: 7/3 post)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
{{page/status/seedling|Sources are needed.}}
 
==Negatives==
 
==Negatives==
{{need/review|Criticism of these points needs to be documented, and sources found. See [[#Notes]].}}
 
 
* make the most noise about fiscal responsibility, but implement irresponsible [[issuepedia:US Republican Party/fiscal policy|fiscal policy]].
 
* make the most noise about fiscal responsibility, but implement irresponsible [[issuepedia:US Republican Party/fiscal policy|fiscal policy]].
 
** want to spend more money on wars
 
** want to spend more money on wars
Line 58: Line 58:
 
* '''2015-02-26''' [http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/02/26/1275645/-How-Ohio-Pulled-4-Billion-from-Communities-and-Redistributed-It-Upwards How Ohio Pulled $4 Billion+ from Communities and Redistributed It Upwards]
 
* '''2015-02-26''' [http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/02/26/1275645/-How-Ohio-Pulled-4-Billion-from-Communities-and-Redistributed-It-Upwards How Ohio Pulled $4 Billion+ from Communities and Redistributed It Upwards]
 
** [https://plus.google.com/u/0/+PamelaZuppo/posts/jD3AyTubTZi Another republican horror story.]
 
** [https://plus.google.com/u/0/+PamelaZuppo/posts/jD3AyTubTZi Another republican horror story.]
 +
* '''2015-02-27''' [http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/02/27/us-usa-veterans-congress-idUSBREA1Q26O20140227 U.S. Senate Republicans block veterans' health bill on budget worry]
 
* '''2015-03-05''' [http://arstechnica.com/business/2015/03/republicans-internet-freedom-act-would-wipe-out-net-neutrality/ Republicans' "Internet Freedom Act" would wipe out net neutrality] "Once the federal government establishes a foothold into managing how Internet service providers run their networks they will essentially be deciding which content goes first, second, third, or not at all..." — US Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) -- except that this is untrue, and her legislation would leave the door open for the ISPs to do exactly that.
 
* '''2015-03-05''' [http://arstechnica.com/business/2015/03/republicans-internet-freedom-act-would-wipe-out-net-neutrality/ Republicans' "Internet Freedom Act" would wipe out net neutrality] "Once the federal government establishes a foothold into managing how Internet service providers run their networks they will essentially be deciding which content goes first, second, third, or not at all..." — US Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) -- except that this is untrue, and her legislation would leave the door open for the ISPs to do exactly that.
 
* '''2015-03-18''' [http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/03/tenn-goper-slams-volkswagen-creating-200000-jobs-is-intentionally-a-magnet-for-unionized-labor/ Tenn. GOPer slams Volkswagen: Creating 200,000 jobs is ‘intentionally’ a ‘magnet for unionized labor’]: do they want to create jobs or not??
 
* '''2015-03-18''' [http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/03/tenn-goper-slams-volkswagen-creating-200000-jobs-is-intentionally-a-magnet-for-unionized-labor/ Tenn. GOPer slams Volkswagen: Creating 200,000 jobs is ‘intentionally’ a ‘magnet for unionized labor’]: do they want to create jobs or not??
 +
* '''2015-05-20''' [http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/north-carolina-sues-fcc-over-municipal-broadband/Content?oid=4440673 North Carolina sues FCC over municipal broadband]: NC's Republican state government prefers monopolies over competition
 +
* '''2015-06-03''' [http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/north-carolinas-solar-industry-is-booming-so-why-are-state-republicans-threatening-to-strangle-it/Content?oid=4475291 North Carolina's solar industry is booming. So why are state Republicans threatening to strangle it?]
 +
* '''2015-06-24''' [http://www.indyweek.com/indyweek/north-carolina-legislature-could-gut-lake-river-protections/Content North Carolina Legislature could gut lake, river protections]: Republicans prefer profits over a healthy and aesthetic environment
 +
* '''2015-07-03''' [https://plus.google.com/u/0/+PamelaZuppo/posts/Mp4sGvjX1DP Republicans on the House Appropriations Committee added riders to a spending bill that would limit the White House’s ability to require contractor disclosure] and other things. This post needs to be combed for specifics and sources.
  
 
==Positives==
 
==Positives==

Latest revision as of 14:08, 6 July 2015

seedling article
This article is incomplete. It might be useful as a reference, but avoid offering it as a definitive presentation. Sources are needed.

Negatives

  • make the most noise about fiscal responsibility, but implement irresponsible fiscal policy.
    • want to spend more money on wars
      • ...but not interested in paying for said wars through raised taxes
      • ...but not interested in taking care of the veterans of said wars
  • use small government arguments to get what they want while actually making government more oppressive
  • favor private wealth-concentration over conservation of common wealth
  • oppose funding for:
    • public education
    • public health
    • public safety
  • endorse religion as a basis for governance (dominionism); anti-secular
  • take many positions that cannot be defended rationally (typically for religious reasons):
    • anti-science
    • against sex education
    • against easy access to contraceptives
    • against bodily autonomy for women
    • favor racial profiling over more accurate methods of identifying criminals
    • oppose any kind of marriage or sexual relations except heterosexual
      • formerly used many of the same (bad) arguments to defend opposition to "interracial" marriages
  • favor authoritarian, top-down society with high inequality
    • pro-patriarchy
    • pro-plutonomy:
      • embrace the idea of selling principles to the highest bidder
      • against income taxation, especially of the wealthy and large businesses (i.e. the major funders of their campaigns)
    • tend to believe the "just world" fallacy
    • unsympathetic to those in need
  • originated and support the "war on terror"
  • originated and support the "war on drugs"
  • high level of tribalism (draw sharp line between "us" and "them"; expect unquestioning loyalty to "us")
  • supported the Wall Street bailout actually, it looks like more Democrats voted for this
  • 2010: after complaining that action on a small-business jobs bill was taking too long, Republicans effectively blocked passage of the bill when it was up for a vote.

Pages

News Items

Positives

CWRE is seeking input regarding positive aspects of the Republican Party versus other parties. We are not aware of any at this time.

Links

Notes

There was considerable back-and-forth regarding criticism of the above points in comments here; these should probably be mapped out somewhere.