Difference between revisions of "Republican Party"

From CWRE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(h/t)
(moved Ryan budget article to Issuepedia)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
==Negatives==
 
==Negatives==
 
{{need/review|Criticism of these points needs to be documented, and sources found. See [[#Notes]].}}
 
{{need/review|Criticism of these points needs to be documented, and sources found. See [[#Notes]].}}
* want to spend more money on wars
+
* make the most noise about fiscal responsibility, but implement irresponsible [[issuepedia:US Republican Party/fiscal policy|fiscal policy]].
** ...but not interested in paying for said wars through raised taxes
+
** want to spend more money on wars
** ...but not interested in taking care of the veterans of said wars
+
*** ...but not interested in paying for said wars through raised taxes
 +
*** ...but not interested in taking care of the veterans of said wars
 
* use {{l/sub|small government}} arguments to get what they want while actually [[/large government|making government more oppressive]]
 
* use {{l/sub|small government}} arguments to get what they want while actually [[/large government|making government more oppressive]]
 
* favor private wealth-concentration over conservation of common wealth
 
* favor private wealth-concentration over conservation of common wealth
Line 52: Line 53:
 
* '''2015-01-07''' [http://thinkprogress.org/health/2015/01/07/3608821/congress-20-week-abortion/ Congress Introduces A National Abortion Ban On Its Very First Day Back] ([https://plus.google.com/u/0/113630203692968581887/posts/CH1MGm7hJEz h/t]) "Reps. Trent Franks (R-AZ) and Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) reintroduced the [https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-bill/1797 Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act], the same legislation that successfully [http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/06/18/2171791/national-20-week-abortion-ban-explainer/ passed the House] last year."
 
* '''2015-01-07''' [http://thinkprogress.org/health/2015/01/07/3608821/congress-20-week-abortion/ Congress Introduces A National Abortion Ban On Its Very First Day Back] ([https://plus.google.com/u/0/113630203692968581887/posts/CH1MGm7hJEz h/t]) "Reps. Trent Franks (R-AZ) and Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) reintroduced the [https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/house-bill/1797 Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act], the same legislation that successfully [http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/06/18/2171791/national-20-week-abortion-ban-explainer/ passed the House] last year."
 
* '''2015-02-03''' [http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/paul-ryan-puts-mask-doesnt-fit Paul Ryan puts on a mask that doesn't fit] ([https://plus.google.com/u/0/+TheRachelMaddowShow/posts/5rVbc4sVm1L G+]) "Jon Chait, [http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/02/paul-ryans-most-shameless-lie-ever.html understandably gobsmacked] by Ryan’s nutty rhetoric, noted that it's Obama who has pushed for a series of federal policies that reduce inequality and transfer resources from the top down, while the far-right Wisconsinite has done the polar opposite, rejecting the president’s ideas and pushing an economic agenda that would slash taxes even more on the very wealthy..."
 
* '''2015-02-03''' [http://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/paul-ryan-puts-mask-doesnt-fit Paul Ryan puts on a mask that doesn't fit] ([https://plus.google.com/u/0/+TheRachelMaddowShow/posts/5rVbc4sVm1L G+]) "Jon Chait, [http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/02/paul-ryans-most-shameless-lie-ever.html understandably gobsmacked] by Ryan’s nutty rhetoric, noted that it's Obama who has pushed for a series of federal policies that reduce inequality and transfer resources from the top down, while the far-right Wisconsinite has done the polar opposite, rejecting the president’s ideas and pushing an economic agenda that would slash taxes even more on the very wealthy..."
* '''2015-02-04''' [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/04/paul-ryan-taxes_n_6615076.html Paul Ryan's First Tax Legislation Adds Nearly $100 Billion To Deficit] ([https://plus.google.com/u/0/106159515314594763284/posts/TNySxBevztk h/t]) "The first bills promoted by Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) as the new chairman of the tax-writing Ways and Means Committee would add nearly $100 billion to the deficit over 10 years. [..] Ryan, a deficit hawk during his time as the chairman of the Budget Committee for the previous six years, made his fame proposing budgets that aimed to dramatically cut domestic spending and balance the budget within a decade."
 
  
 
==Positives==
 
==Positives==
 
CWRE is seeking input regarding positive aspects of the Republican Party versus other parties. We are not aware of any at this time.
 
CWRE is seeking input regarding positive aspects of the Republican Party versus other parties. We are not aware of any at this time.
 
==Links==
 
==Links==
 +
* [[issuepedia:US Republican Party]]
 
* [[issuepedia:US/NC/gov]]: some details of what happened after the Republican Party took over North Carolina's state government
 
* [[issuepedia:US/NC/gov]]: some details of what happened after the Republican Party took over North Carolina's state government
 
* [https://plus.google.com/u/0/102227800261183349957/posts/jXfCi7wG6yR Bernie Sanders: meme about Republicans]
 
* [https://plus.google.com/u/0/102227800261183349957/posts/jXfCi7wG6yR Bernie Sanders: meme about Republicans]
 
==Notes==
 
==Notes==
 
There was considerable back-and-forth regarding criticism of the above points in comments [https://plus.google.com/u/0/102282887764745350285/posts/21wL6MNoGCB here]; these should probably be mapped out somewhere.
 
There was considerable back-and-forth regarding criticism of the above points in comments [https://plus.google.com/u/0/102282887764745350285/posts/21wL6MNoGCB here]; these should probably be mapped out somewhere.

Revision as of 15:38, 5 February 2015

Negatives

One or more statements on this page need to be checked for accuracy and provided with sources if correct. Criticism of these points needs to be documented, and sources found. See #Notes.
  • make the most noise about fiscal responsibility, but implement irresponsible fiscal policy.
    • want to spend more money on wars
      • ...but not interested in paying for said wars through raised taxes
      • ...but not interested in taking care of the veterans of said wars
  • use small government arguments to get what they want while actually making government more oppressive
  • favor private wealth-concentration over conservation of common wealth
  • oppose funding for:
    • public education
    • public health
    • public safety
  • endorse religion as a basis for governance (dominionism); anti-secular
  • take many positions that cannot be defended rationally (typically for religious reasons):
    • anti-science
    • against sex education
    • against easy access to contraceptives
    • against bodily autonomy for women
    • favor racial profiling over more accurate methods of identifying criminals
    • oppose any kind of marriage or sexual relations except heterosexual
      • formerly used many of the same (bad) arguments to defend opposition to "interracial" marriages
  • favor authoritarian, top-down society with high inequality
    • pro-patriarchy
    • pro-plutonomy:
      • embrace the idea of selling principles to the highest bidder
      • against income taxation, especially of the wealthy and large businesses (i.e. the major funders of their campaigns)
    • tend to believe the "just world" fallacy
    • unsympathetic to those in need
  • originated and support the "war on terror"
  • originated and support the "war on drugs"
  • high level of tribalism (draw sharp line between "us" and "them"; expect unquestioning loyalty to "us")
  • supported the Wall Street bailout actually, it looks like more Democrats voted for this
  • 2010: after complaining that action on a small-business jobs bill was taking too long, Republicans effectively blocked passage of the bill when it was up for a vote.

Pages

News Items

Positives

CWRE is seeking input regarding positive aspects of the Republican Party versus other parties. We are not aware of any at this time.

Links

Notes

There was considerable back-and-forth regarding criticism of the above points in comments here; these should probably be mapped out somewhere.