Difference between revisions of "Republican Party"

From CWRE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(more grouping of positions)
(Republicans in Alabama)
Line 40: Line 40:
 
* '''2014-12-04''' [http://www.addictinginfo.org/2014/12/04/republicans-vow-punish-poor-people-with-higher-taxes-obamas-executive-action/ Republicans Vow To Punish Poor People With Higher Taxes Because Of Obama's Executive Action]: Republicans aren't above taking their own constituents hostage when they don't get their way ([https://plus.google.com/b/109185295204629063487/116698623793401513314/posts/MVEF69SeBXw h/t])
 
* '''2014-12-04''' [http://www.addictinginfo.org/2014/12/04/republicans-vow-punish-poor-people-with-higher-taxes-obamas-executive-action/ Republicans Vow To Punish Poor People With Higher Taxes Because Of Obama's Executive Action]: Republicans aren't above taking their own constituents hostage when they don't get their way ([https://plus.google.com/b/109185295204629063487/116698623793401513314/posts/MVEF69SeBXw h/t])
 
* '''2014-12-05''' [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/12/05/government-shutdown-retirement-rule_n_6279006.html Government Shutdown Talks May Gut Retirement Security Rule]: ''"The policy would impose a "fiduciary duty" on financial professionals who oversee retirement accounts, barring them from considering the potential profits of their own firm when choosing investments. Instead, investment managers would have to pick stocks, bonds and other assets based only on what was in the best interest of retirees."'' Never mind helping the poor; Republicans won't even act to protect individual investors. ''"Republicans are pushing a budget rider that would require the Labor Department to mediate its rule with the more corporate-friendly Securities and Exchange Commission, which financial reform experts said they believe would render the proposal toothless, if it ever made it out of the bureaucratic negotiations at all. The GOP-led House has voted to block the Labor Department from moving forward with the rule in the past."''
 
* '''2014-12-05''' [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/12/05/government-shutdown-retirement-rule_n_6279006.html Government Shutdown Talks May Gut Retirement Security Rule]: ''"The policy would impose a "fiduciary duty" on financial professionals who oversee retirement accounts, barring them from considering the potential profits of their own firm when choosing investments. Instead, investment managers would have to pick stocks, bonds and other assets based only on what was in the best interest of retirees."'' Never mind helping the poor; Republicans won't even act to protect individual investors. ''"Republicans are pushing a budget rider that would require the Labor Department to mediate its rule with the more corporate-friendly Securities and Exchange Commission, which financial reform experts said they believe would render the proposal toothless, if it ever made it out of the bureaucratic negotiations at all. The GOP-led House has voted to block the Labor Department from moving forward with the rule in the past."''
 
+
* '''2014-12-23''' [http://www.al.com/opinion/index.ssf/2014/12/republicans_its_ok_to_admit_yo.html Republicans: It's OK to admit you were wrong] "Here in Alabama, the Republicans have been wrong about taxes, the state budget, closing Veteran's Assistance offices, Medicaid expansion, and the effectiveness of corporate welfare because all they talked about during the election was who hated Obama more than their opponent. .. They were wrong about trying to put the Ten Commandments in the courthouse and wrong about trying to make Christianity the state religion."
 
==Positives==
 
==Positives==
 
CWRE is seeking input regarding positive aspects of the Republican Party versus other parties. We are not aware of any at this time.
 
CWRE is seeking input regarding positive aspects of the Republican Party versus other parties. We are not aware of any at this time.
 
==Links==
 
==Links==
 
* [[issuepedia:US/NC/gov]]: some details of what happened after the Republican Party took over North Carolina's state government
 
* [[issuepedia:US/NC/gov]]: some details of what happened after the Republican Party took over North Carolina's state government

Revision as of 04:05, 25 December 2014

Negatives

  • pro-war
    • ...but not interested in paying for said wars through raised taxes
    • ...but not interested in taking care of the veterans of said wars
  • support global warming denial
  • endorse religion as a basis for governance (dominionism); anti-secular
  • take many positions that cannot be defended rationally (typically for religious reasons):
    • anti-science
    • against sex education
    • against easy access to contraceptives
    • against bodily autonomy for women
    • favor racial profiling over more accurate methods of identifying criminals
    • oppose any kind of marriage or sexual relations except heterosexual
      • formerly used many of the same (bad) arguments to defend opposition to "interracial" marriages
  • favor authoritarian, top-down society with high inequality
    • pro-patriarchy
    • pro-plutonomy:
      • embrace the idea of selling principles to the highest bidder
      • against income taxation, especially of the wealthy and large businesses (i.e. the major funders of their campaigns)
    • tend to believe the "just world" fallacy
    • unsympathetic to those in need
  • originated and support the "war on terror"
  • originated and support the "war on drugs"
  • high level of tribalism (draw sharp line between "us" and "them"; expect unquestioning loyalty to "us")
  • use small government arguments to get what they want while actually making government more oppressive
  • supported the Wall Street bailout

Pages

News Items

Positives

CWRE is seeking input regarding positive aspects of the Republican Party versus other parties. We are not aware of any at this time.

Links

  • issuepedia:US/NC/gov: some details of what happened after the Republican Party took over North Carolina's state government