Difference between revisions of "Republican Party"

From CWRE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(created /poverty subpage (renamed from /welfare))
(GOP doesn't care about investors)
Line 22: Line 22:
 
** ...while claiming to favor [[small government]]
 
** ...while claiming to favor [[small government]]
 
===News Items===
 
===News Items===
 +
* '''2014-10-22''' [http://www.masslive.com/politics/index.ssf/2012/10/gop_mailer_attacking_elizabeth.html GOP mailer attacking Elizabeth Warren on TARP bailout misleading]: Warren did ''not'' endorse the Wall Street bailout; she criticized it.
 +
* '''2014-11-09'''
 +
** [http://aattp.org/navy-appoints-first-ever-atheist-as-a-lay-leader-right-wing-freakout-ensues Navy Appoints First Ever Atheist Lay Leader, Right Wing Freakout Ensues] "Republicans on the House Armed Services Committee objected strenuously saying that a secular humanist chaplain would make a mockery of the chaplaincy and denigrate religious soldiers and their families." -- an expression of [[dominionism]]
 +
** [http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/11/09/3590606/senators-suggest-they-could-block-attorney-general-nominee-over-immigration-fight/ Ted Cruz Threatens To Block Attorney General Nominee]: Republicans threaten to block Attorney General nominee over non-existent problem
 
* '''2014-11-10''' [https://twitter.com/SenTedCruz/status/531834493922189313 Tweet]: ""Net Neutrality" is Obamacare for the Internet; the Internet should not operate at the speed of government." Implies that Obamacare is slow and inefficient; implies that net neutrality will slow down the internet. False on both counts (although lack of net neutrality would make it possible for elites to purchase faster speed for their sites -- which would be consistent with the Republican view that {{l/sub|only elites matter}}.)
 
* '''2014-11-10''' [https://twitter.com/SenTedCruz/status/531834493922189313 Tweet]: ""Net Neutrality" is Obamacare for the Internet; the Internet should not operate at the speed of government." Implies that Obamacare is slow and inefficient; implies that net neutrality will slow down the internet. False on both counts (although lack of net neutrality would make it possible for elites to purchase faster speed for their sites -- which would be consistent with the Republican view that {{l/sub|only elites matter}}.)
 
** [http://theoatmeal.com/blog/net_neutrality The Oatmeal] helpfully explains [[net neutrality]] to SenTedCruz.
 
** [http://theoatmeal.com/blog/net_neutrality The Oatmeal] helpfully explains [[net neutrality]] to SenTedCruz.
 
** '''2014-11-15''' [https://www.techdirt.com/blog/netneutrality/articles/20141115/07454429157/ted-cruz-doubles-down-misunderstanding-internet-net-neutrality-as-republican-engineers-call-him-out-ignorance.shtml Ted Cruz Doubles Down On Misunderstanding The Internet & Net Neutrality, As Republican Engineers Call Him Out For Ignorance]
 
** '''2014-11-15''' [https://www.techdirt.com/blog/netneutrality/articles/20141115/07454429157/ted-cruz-doubles-down-misunderstanding-internet-net-neutrality-as-republican-engineers-call-him-out-ignorance.shtml Ted Cruz Doubles Down On Misunderstanding The Internet & Net Neutrality, As Republican Engineers Call Him Out For Ignorance]
 
** '''2014-11-17''' [http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2014/11/16/3592811/al-franken-ted-cruz-wrong-net-neutrality/ Al Franken Explains Why Ted Cruz Doesn’t Understand The Internet]
 
** '''2014-11-17''' [http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2014/11/16/3592811/al-franken-ted-cruz-wrong-net-neutrality/ Al Franken Explains Why Ted Cruz Doesn’t Understand The Internet]
* '''2014-11-09'''
+
* '''2014-12-05''' [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/12/05/government-shutdown-retirement-rule_n_6279006.html Government Shutdown Talks May Gut Retirement Security Rule]: ''"The policy would impose a "fiduciary duty" on financial professionals who oversee retirement accounts, barring them from considering the potential profits of their own firm when choosing investments. Instead, investment managers would have to pick stocks, bonds and other assets based only on what was in the best interest of retirees."'' Never mind helping the poor; Republicans won't even act to protect individual investors. ''"Republicans are pushing a budget rider that would require the Labor Department to mediate its rule with the more corporate-friendly Securities and Exchange Commission, which financial reform experts said they believe would render the proposal toothless, if it ever made it out of the bureaucratic negotiations at all. The GOP-led House has voted to block the Labor Department from moving forward with the rule in the past."''
** [http://aattp.org/navy-appoints-first-ever-atheist-as-a-lay-leader-right-wing-freakout-ensues Navy Appoints First Ever Atheist Lay Leader, Right Wing Freakout Ensues] "Republicans on the House Armed Services Committee objected strenuously saying that a secular humanist chaplain would make a mockery of the chaplaincy and denigrate religious soldiers and their families." -- an expression of [[dominionism]]
+
 
** [http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/11/09/3590606/senators-suggest-they-could-block-attorney-general-nominee-over-immigration-fight/ Ted Cruz Threatens To Block Attorney General Nominee]: Republicans threaten to block Attorney General nominee over non-existent problem
 
* '''2014-10-22''' [http://www.masslive.com/politics/index.ssf/2012/10/gop_mailer_attacking_elizabeth.html GOP mailer attacking Elizabeth Warren on TARP bailout misleading]: Warren did ''not'' endorse the Wall Street bailout; she criticized it.
 
 
==Positives==
 
==Positives==
 
CWRE is seeking input regarding positive aspects of the Republican Party versus other parties. We are not aware of any at this time.
 
CWRE is seeking input regarding positive aspects of the Republican Party versus other parties. We are not aware of any at this time.
 +
==Links==
 +
* [[issuepedia:US/NC/gov]]: some details of what happened after the Republican Party took over North Carolina's state government

Revision as of 01:58, 7 December 2014

Negatives

  • anti-science
  • pro-war
    • ...but not interested in paying for said wars through raised taxes
    • ...but not interested in taking care of the veterans of said wars
  • support global warming denial
  • endorse religion as a basis for governance (dominionism); anti-secular
  • against sex education
  • against easy access to contraceptives
  • against bodily autonomy for women
  • pro-patriarchy
  • pro-plutonomy:
    • embrace the idea of selling principles to the highest bidder
    • against income taxation, especially of the wealthy and large businesses (i.e. the major funders of their campaigns)
  • favor authoritarian, top-down society with high inequality
  • favor racial profiling over more accurate methods of identifying criminals
  • originated and support the "war on terror"
  • originated and support the "war on drugs"
  • unsympathetic to those in need
  • high level of tribalism (draw sharp line between "us" and "them"; expect unquestioning loyalty to "us")
  • created the incompetent TSA and the unnecessary and redundant Orwellonymic "Department of Homeland Security"

News Items

Positives

CWRE is seeking input regarding positive aspects of the Republican Party versus other parties. We are not aware of any at this time.

Links

  • issuepedia:US/NC/gov: some details of what happened after the Republican Party took over North Carolina's state government