Difference between revisions of "Marketism/violence"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "Within marketism, the words {{l/same|violence}} and {{l/same|force}} are often used interchangeably, especially with regard to the {{l/same|initiation of violence}} (a.k.a. "w...") |
(tweaks; coercion) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Within marketism, the words {{l/same|violence}} and {{l/same|force}} are | + | Within marketism, the words {{l/same|violence}} and {{l/same|force}} are used synonymously, especially with regard to the {{l/same|initiation of violence}} (a.k.a. "who started it"). |
| + | |||
| + | The ''threat'' of violence is also considered to be ethically equivalent to its usage (see {{l/same|initiation of violence}}). | ||
Violence in response to violence is more commonly referred to as {{l/same|self-defense}}, which is considered ethically acceptable or even desirable. | Violence in response to violence is more commonly referred to as {{l/same|self-defense}}, which is considered ethically acceptable or even desirable. | ||
| + | ==Related== | ||
| + | * {{l/same|coercion}} | ||
Latest revision as of 21:51, 21 March 2015
Within marketism, the words violence and force are used synonymously, especially with regard to the initiation of violence (a.k.a. "who started it").
The threat of violence is also considered to be ethically equivalent to its usage (see initiation of violence).
Violence in response to violence is more commonly referred to as self-defense, which is considered ethically acceptable or even desirable.