Ammophilia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.
seed article |
---|
This article is under construction and should not be used as a reference. |
Claims
Source Posts
2015-05-30 Texas Senate green-lights campus carry - much gun-nuttery
- 2014-04-04 Here’s What Happened to Crime in Chicago After Illinois Finally Passed Concealed Carry Law
- The article linked to as a source for the claim about reduced crime is no longer there, but may be available on the Wayback Machine. Wolfram-Alpha only goes up to 2009.
Lots of potential material in this post:
- Loaded questions:
- Q: If you think a “no guns” sign is sufficient, why do we have metal detectors at airports?
- A: It's sufficient in a public park, where someone with a gun could only kill dozens of people; used to take over an airplane, a gun could potentially kill thousands (as in 9/11). (This is so obvious it shouldn't have to be explained.)
- Q: You think if you don’t see a gun on a person, he doesn’t have one?
- A: No. The ability to have someone removed if a gun is spotted acts as a deterrent.
- Q: "If I walk in one door with a gun on my hip, walk through the room, and out the opposite door, how did that harm you?"
- A: This is equivalent to asking "If I do something dangerous but it comes out okay, then who have I harmed?". It should be obvious that this is not a responsible question.
- Q: If you think a “no guns” sign is sufficient, why do we have metal detectors at airports?
- Bogus arguments:
- "when guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns" variations:
- "Putting up a sign at a park can only ever stop law-abiding people from bringing their guns into the park."
- (The basic argument here is that laws don't act as a deterrent to criminals; that claim is explored here.)
- "...the people we really don't want to have guns in those areas are the same people who would ignore the ban. "
- (Even just reducing the number of law-abiding citizens carrying guns would be a good thing, as this would reduce the number of accidental gun deaths.)
- "Putting up a sign at a park can only ever stop law-abiding people from bringing their guns into the park."
- Anti-gun sentiment is just bigotry - "your statement sounds dangerously close to the same kind of wording you see republicans using when talking about gays."
- (The implied equivalence is incorrect; guns are actually harmful.)
- "when guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns" variations:
Reality
- 2013-04-07 Debunking 18 Pro-Gun Myths