Difference between revisions of "The Machinery of Freedom/animated lecture"

From CWRE
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(saving work)
m (moving category to /claims)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Claims==
+
==Index==
* The term "liberalism" was stolen by the enemies of liberalism; modern libertarians are the true liberals.
+
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTYkdEU_B4o The Machinery Of Freedom: Illustrated summary]: the video
* Libertarianism (formerly called liberalism) is the philosophy that supports [[small government]] and [[free market]]s.
 
* Libertarianism holds that the function of government is to do a few things that can't be done by individuals associating voluntarily in private markets:
 
** police
 
** courts
 
** national defense
 
* [[Anti-governmentism/private is better|Where the same thing can be done either by government or privately, private is always better.]]
 
* The basic functions of government can be handled privately:
 
** '''police''' (enforcing laws)
 
*** individuals hire private firms (rights enforcement agencies - REAs) to protect their rights and settle their disputes with other individual
 
**** objection (DF): conflict between REAs
 
***** response: violence is expensive -- REAs are not likely to use it to settle conflicts because in the long term it's a losing proposition with uneven results -- so REAs will agree to arbitration.
 
****** objection (W): What if an REA is unreasonable?
 
****** objection (DF,W): What if two REAs can't agree on an arbiter? (e.g. what if one REA's customers prefer a death penalty, while another REA's customers are opposed?)
 
******* DF responds with an argument that has something to do with raising prices in response to demand and/or buying the acquiescence of the other and/or its customers. This doesn't really answer the question.
 
** '''courts''' (making laws)
 
*** REAs hire arbitration agencies (AAs) to settle their disputes with other REAs
 
**** objection (DF): who enforces the AA-mediated agreements between REAs?
 
***** response: the [[discipline of constant dealings]]
 
****** objection: ...which requires a highly stable, non-transient society
 
** <s>national defense</s> (not covered)
 
* It's okay for different sets of people/entities to operate under different sets of rules, because:
 
** any rules applicable to any given interaction can be worked out and agreed to non-coercively via this method
 
** rules will be more closely tailored to the needs of the people ruled by them
 
* Rules created by private negotiation will be better than those produced by government because {{l/sub|private is better|anti-governmentism}}.
 
* Private markets produce better products than socialist systems do -- "we expect markets to produce better cars than socialist systems".
 
** Objection: it's not clear what definition of "socialism" he's using here.
 
*** Europe (especially Sweden) is often called "socialist", but they produce pretty good cars.
 
==Pages==
 
 
* [[/transcription]]: a complete transcription of the lecture in the video
 
* [[/transcription]]: a complete transcription of the lecture in the video
==Links==
+
* [[/claims]]: listing and analysis of the arguments made in the lecture
* [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTYkdEU_B4o The Machinery Of Freedom: Illustrated summary]: the video
 

Latest revision as of 18:09, 23 May 2015

Index