Difference between revisions of "Awards/Golden Straw-Man"
< Awards
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(saving work; enter nominees tomorrow) |
(Morcombe) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | The '''Golden Straw-Man Award''' is given to those who most blatantly misrepresent their opponents' arguments | + | The '''Golden Straw-Man Award''' is given to those who most blatantly misrepresent their opponents' arguments so as to demolish their position. We haven't yet worked out how often the award will be bestowed or what it will consist of, but we are definitely thinking hard about it. |
| − | It is named jointly after the {{l/ip|straw man argument}} and | + | It is named jointly after the {{l/ip|straw man argument}} and [[wikipedia:Scarecrow (Oz)|a well-known fantasy character]] who wishes for a brain. |
==Nominees== | ==Nominees== | ||
| + | * '''2014/12/16''' Peter Morcombe, for [https://diggingintheclay.wordpress.com/2014/12/16/countering-consensus-calculations/ Countering Consensus Calculations]: "Nobody believes in CAGW any more; today we discuss 'Climate Change'. You have to love the brilliance of this re-branding... who could dissent with the idea that climate will change?" He goes on to rant about the downsizing of Kennedy Space Center "while the Goddard Institute of Space Studies remains fully funded"; all of his hypotheses about why this might be the case assume injustice or incompetence. (The {{l/wp|Goddard Institute for Space Studies}} (GISS) is focused on Earth studies, including climate change.) | ||
Revision as of 12:42, 6 February 2015
The Golden Straw-Man Award is given to those who most blatantly misrepresent their opponents' arguments so as to demolish their position. We haven't yet worked out how often the award will be bestowed or what it will consist of, but we are definitely thinking hard about it.
It is named jointly after the straw man argument and a well-known fantasy character who wishes for a brain.
Nominees
- 2014/12/16 Peter Morcombe, for Countering Consensus Calculations: "Nobody believes in CAGW any more; today we discuss 'Climate Change'. You have to love the brilliance of this re-branding... who could dissent with the idea that climate will change?" He goes on to rant about the downsizing of Kennedy Space Center "while the Goddard Institute of Space Studies remains fully funded"; all of his hypotheses about why this might be the case assume injustice or incompetence. (The Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) is focused on Earth studies, including climate change.)