Difference between revisions of "User:Woozle/Why Republicans Suck"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(→Notes: linkdrop) |
(moved remaining globs of text to their own chapters) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
* [[/Trump]] | * [[/Trump]] | ||
* [[/bad Democrats]] | * [[/bad Democrats]] | ||
− | * | + | * [[/policies]] |
− | * | + | * [[/leadership]] |
− | |||
− | |||
Not sure if this is on-topic: | Not sure if this is on-topic: | ||
* [[/right-wing assholery]] | * [[/right-wing assholery]] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
==Resources== | ==Resources== | ||
* [http://republicanssucks.org/ Republicans Suck]: not the site I want to do, but may have some useful information | * [http://republicanssucks.org/ Republicans Suck]: not the site I want to do, but may have some useful information |
Revision as of 13:54, 5 April 2016
Chapters
- /intro
- /badness
- /political philosophy
- /dysconservatism
- /counterfactualism
- /moral absolutism
- /Trump
- /bad Democrats
- /policies
- /leadership
Not sure if this is on-topic:
Resources
- Republicans Suck: not the site I want to do, but may have some useful information
Notes
- http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/07/25/1316539/-That-FL-CEO-Who-Said-He-d-FIRE-Everyone-if-Obama-Elected-Guess-What-Happened - Republican myths don't just harm poor people. This CEO believed them and tried to compel his workers to vote against his and their best interests.
- https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/supreme-court-rejects-conservative-bid-to-count-only-eligible-voters-for-districts/2016/04/04/67393e52-fa6f-11e5-9140-e61d062438bb_story.html - more inconsistency: the court did reinstate "one person one vote". The dysconservatives wanted "one qualified voter, one vote".