Difference between revisions of "Propaganda/tyranny of the majority"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Woozle moved page Meaningless phrases/Tyranny of the majority to Propaganda/tyranny of the majority without leaving a redirect: recategorizing / reorganizing) |
(simplified; get to the propaganda angle in "reality") |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[category:implicit arguments]] | [[category:implicit arguments]] | ||
==About== | ==About== | ||
| − | + | Although it refers to a legitimate concern, the phrase "{{l/ip|tyranny of the majority}}" is often used as an implicit argument that the majority should not impose their will on the minority because this is essentially a form of tyranny. | |
===Examples=== | ===Examples=== | ||
* Admiral Taptap says "The collective free will of the vast majority of the US citizenry CHOOSES the taxation system established in the Constitution." Anthony Loera responds "what you describe is called the Tyranny of the majority".<ref name=gplus /> | * Admiral Taptap says "The collective free will of the vast majority of the US citizenry CHOOSES the taxation system established in the Constitution." Anthony Loera responds "what you describe is called the Tyranny of the majority".<ref name=gplus /> | ||
==Reality== | ==Reality== | ||
| − | This | + | This can be used to make arguments supporting the following positions: |
| − | + | * [[/anti-democracy]] | |
| − | + | * [[/anti-government]] | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
===Caveat=== | ===Caveat=== | ||
As US founder James Madison observed in Federalist #10, we must be careful not to let a cohesive majority ''abuse'' a minority – but this is why the US government was designed with various checks and balances to prevent such abuse. However poorly these checks may work in some cases, Madison was never arguing that people shouldn't have to follow rules they don't like. | As US founder James Madison observed in Federalist #10, we must be careful not to let a cohesive majority ''abuse'' a minority – but this is why the US government was designed with various checks and balances to prevent such abuse. However poorly these checks may work in some cases, Madison was never arguing that people shouldn't have to follow rules they don't like. | ||
==Links== | ==Links== | ||
| − | * {{ | + | * {{issuepedia|Tyranny of the majority}} |
==Footnotes== | ==Footnotes== | ||
<references> | <references> | ||
<ref name=gplus>'''2015-07-21''' comments on [https://plus.google.com/u/0/+AdmiralTaptap/posts/NDRjT5uuAu2 Google+ discussion]</ref> | <ref name=gplus>'''2015-07-21''' comments on [https://plus.google.com/u/0/+AdmiralTaptap/posts/NDRjT5uuAu2 Google+ discussion]</ref> | ||
</references> | </references> | ||
Latest revision as of 19:26, 21 July 2015
About
Although it refers to a legitimate concern, the phrase "tyranny of the majority" is often used as an implicit argument that the majority should not impose their will on the minority because this is essentially a form of tyranny.
Examples
- Admiral Taptap says "The collective free will of the vast majority of the US citizenry CHOOSES the taxation system established in the Constitution." Anthony Loera responds "what you describe is called the Tyranny of the majority".[1]
Reality
This can be used to make arguments supporting the following positions:
Caveat
As US founder James Madison observed in Federalist #10, we must be careful not to let a cohesive majority abuse a minority – but this is why the US government was designed with various checks and balances to prevent such abuse. However poorly these checks may work in some cases, Madison was never arguing that people shouldn't have to follow rules they don't like.
Links
Footnotes
- ↑ 2015-07-21 comments on Google+ discussion