<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://cwre.org/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Woozle%2F2021%2F11%2F08</id>
	<title>Woozle/2021/11/08 - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://cwre.org/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Woozle%2F2021%2F11%2F08"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cwre.org/w/index.php?title=Woozle/2021/11/08&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-05-03T12:29:03Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cwre.org/w/index.php?title=Woozle/2021/11/08&amp;diff=2034&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Woozle: Created page with &quot;==About== ''This is a comment crossposted [https://nextdoor.com/p/GLmFD4ZtJKmW/c/682714772?utm_source=share from Nextdoor].'' ==Comment== It's difficult to be quantitative whe...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cwre.org/w/index.php?title=Woozle/2021/11/08&amp;diff=2034&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2021-11-08T17:49:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;==About== &amp;#039;&amp;#039;This is a comment crossposted [https://nextdoor.com/p/GLmFD4ZtJKmW/c/682714772?utm_source=share from Nextdoor].&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ==Comment== It&amp;#039;s difficult to be quantitative whe...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;==About==&lt;br /&gt;
''This is a comment crossposted [https://nextdoor.com/p/GLmFD4ZtJKmW/c/682714772?utm_source=share from Nextdoor].''&lt;br /&gt;
==Comment==&lt;br /&gt;
It's difficult to be quantitative when assessing the performance of a political figure.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although I do think such metrics are possible -- e.g. a Congressbeast's record in supporting/opposing unarguably good or bad legislation -- as far as I know there is no source where this data is accumulated quantitatively. That is a growing need, in this increasingly online/digital era.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It gets even more complicated when talking about a political office such as the Presidency, where actions are much more qualitative.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
That said -- in a case like #45, there are some outstanding metrics one could look at, such as the number of falsehoods told while in office, the number of (at least apparently) illegal acts committed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I can imagine forgiving some of the &amp;quot;softer&amp;quot; areas of his awfulness (e.g. equivocating between N*zis and their victims; painting South Americans as criminals and rapists; speaking unapologetically about committing sexual assault; being an absolutely terrible businessman who squandered his inherited fortune while cheating honest contractors out of payment for their work;...) if he had at least had reasonable policies and had used his manifest charisma to lead rather than mislead.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sadly, he did not.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
His policies were wildly inconsistent and usually seriously bad for the country -- and he clearly had no interest in leading nor any care for the citizenry under his care, except to the extent that they served as funding-troughs or as cheerleaders to feed his deep narcissism.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps the applicable metric here should be &amp;quot;number of ways in which the norms of the office were violated in obviously detrimental ways&amp;quot;. I'm pretty sure his numbers in that area would be the greatest ever.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Woozle</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>