Nextdoor - Revision history

Woozle: /* About */

2022-06-25T15:54:03Z

About

Woozle at 21:03, 7 June 2022

2022-06-07T21:03:58Z

Woozle at 20:55, 7 June 2022

2022-06-07T20:55:45Z

Woozle at 23:13, 24 May 2022

2022-05-24T23:13:35Z

Woozle at 23:12, 24 May 2022

2022-05-24T23:12:17Z

Woozle at 23:09, 24 May 2022

2022-05-24T23:09:17Z

Woozle at 22:08, 24 May 2022

2022-05-24T22:08:48Z

Woozle at 21:47, 24 May 2022

2022-05-24T21:47:02Z

Woozle at 21:34, 24 May 2022

2022-05-24T21:34:01Z

Woozle: /* Usage */

2022-05-24T21:16:44Z

Usage

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 ** [[ND/0021]] mentioning having been suspended, or someone else's suspension, actual or hypothetical
 ** [[ND/0022]] mentioning/discussing/reposting content reports
 * [[ND/0030]] criticism (regardless of how articulately the criticism is defended), often reported as "uncivil, unneighborly, or offensive":
 ** [[ND/0031]] criticizing an individual for holding a particular belief (this will often be described or reported as a "personal attack".)
@@ Line 20: / Line 21: @@
 * [[ND/0050]] presentation of unwanted evidence
 ** [[ND/0051]] quoting a RHs own words back at them, to show inconsistency (this may be referred to as "taking out of context" or "a personal attack")
 ==Usage==
 We have yet to determine whether ND would consider ''linking'' to these topics to be equivalent to ''actually discussing'' them, so it's probably safest to reference them more vaguely, as in <code>CWRE ND 0001</code> or just <code>ND0001</code> if you don't want to give the ND moderator too much of a clue regarding where to find them.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{nav/xsite/cwre-htyp-ip}}
 ==About==
 [[Nextdoor]] is a proprietary "hyperlocal" social network with an unusually strict but also vague set of rules regarding what speech is permitted. They will often suspend users for infractions of these rules, even when said infractions would be tolerated ''or even encouraged'' on any other social network -- from the very safest of spaces to the largest and most corporate/right-wing of commercial social networks such as Facebook or Twitter.

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:55, 7 June 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{nav/xsite/cwre-htyp-ip}}
	==About==		==About==
	[[Nextdoor]] is a proprietary "hyperlocal" social network with an unusually strict but also vague set of rules regarding what speech is permitted. They will often suspend users for infractions of these rules, even when said infractions would be tolerated ''or even encouraged'' on any other social network -- from the very safest of spaces to the largest and most corporate/right-wing of commercial social networks such as Facebook or Twitter.		[[Nextdoor]] is a proprietary "hyperlocal" social network with an unusually strict but also vague set of rules regarding what speech is permitted. They will often suspend users for infractions of these rules, even when said infractions would be tolerated ''or even encouraged'' on any other social network -- from the very safest of spaces to the largest and most corporate/right-wing of commercial social networks such as Facebook or Twitter.

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 ** [[ND/0033]] criticizing a group to which an RH<ref name=rhs /> belongs
 ** [[ND/0034]] criticizing an unnamed group by characteristic (e.g. "some people ''[criticism of those people]''..."). The reporter in these cases clearly identifies with the villain.
 * [[ND/0040]] promoting a group disliked by RHs<ref name=rhs />
 * [[ND/0050]] presentation of unwanted evidence

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 ** [[ND/0032]] ridiculing or insulting political positions, policies, proposals, politicians, or pundits. This may include derogatory nicknames, which may be described as "name-calling".
 ** [[ND/0033]] criticizing a group to which an RH<ref name=rhs /> belongs
-** [[ND/0034]] quoting a RHs own words back at them, to show inconsistency (this may be referred to as "taking out of context" or "a personal attack")
+** [[ND/0034]] criticizing an unnamed group by characteristic (e.g. "some people ''[criticism of those people]''..."). The reporter in these cases clearly identifies with the villain.
 * [[ND/0040]] promoting a group disliked by RHs<ref name=rhs />
 ==Usage==
 We have yet to determine whether ND would consider ''linking'' to these topics to be equivalent to ''actually discussing'' them, so it's probably safest to reference them more vaguely, as in <code>CWRE ND 0001</code> or just <code>ND0001</code> if you don't want to give the ND moderator too much of a clue regarding where to find them.

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 The following codes may be used to reference comment-material which could result in suspension if actually spelled out:
 * [[ND/0010]] cursing, especially in the presence of RHs<ref name=rhs />
-* [[ND/0020]] discussing moderation outside of specific groups approved for this purpose. This includes mentions of being suspended (in actuality or hypothetically) or discussing reported content.
+* [[ND/0020]] discussing moderation outside of specific groups approved for this purpose.
-* [[ND/0031]] criticizing beliefs, or criticizing people for holding those beliefs (regardless of how articulately the criticism is defended).
+** [[ND/0021]] mentioning having been suspended, or someone else's suspension, actual or hypothetical
-* [[ND/0032]] citicizing an individual for holding a particular belief (this will often be described or reported as a "personal attack".)
+** [[ND/0022]] mentioning/discussing/reposting content reports
-* [[ND/0033]] ridiculing or insulting political positions, policies, proposals, politicians, or pundits. This may include derogatory nicknames, which may be described as "name-calling".
+* [[ND/0030]] criticism (regardless of how articulately the criticism is defended), often reported as "uncivil, unneighborly, or offensive":
-* [[ND/0034]] quoting a RHs own words back at them, to show inconsistency (this may be referred to as "taking out of context" or "a personal attack")
+** [[ND/0031]] criticizing an individual for holding a particular belief (this will often be described or reported as a "personal attack".)
 * [[ND/0040]] promoting a group disliked by RHs<ref name=rhs />
 ==Usage==

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:08, 24 May 2022
Line 18:		Line 18:
	<ref name=rhs>reportophilic hostiles, i.e. people who are quick to file reports for anything they don't like, and what they don't like is everything you talk about</ref>		<ref name=rhs>reportophilic hostiles, i.e. people who are quick to file reports for anything they don't like, and what they don't like is everything you talk about</ref>
	</references>		</references>
		+	==Notes==
		+	I think I need some classifications...
		+	* things that ND might actually suspend you for
		+	* things that conservoids may report but that are not actually violations
		+	* things that conservoids do which are deeply problematic but not ND violations
		+	* things that conservoids do which are arguably ND violations but they get away with it a lot anyhow

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 * [[ND/0004]] discussing moderation outside of specific groups approved for this purpose. This includes mentions of being suspended (in actuality or hypothetically) or discussing reported content.
 ==Usage==
-We have yet to determine whether ND would consider ''linking'' to these topics to be equivalent to ''actually discussing'' them, so it's probably safest to reference them more vaguely, asn in <code>CWRE ND 0001</code> or just <code>ND0001</code> if you don't want to give the ND moderator too much of a clue regarding where to find them.
+We have yet to determine whether ND would consider ''linking'' to these topics to be equivalent to ''actually discussing'' them, so it's probably safest to reference them more vaguely, as in <code>CWRE ND 0001</code> or just <code>ND0001</code> if you don't want to give the ND moderator too much of a clue regarding where to find them.