<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://cwre.org/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Myths%2FObamacare%2Fis_a_luxury_we_can%27t_afford</id>
	<title>Myths/Obamacare/is a luxury we can't afford - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://cwre.org/w/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Myths%2FObamacare%2Fis_a_luxury_we_can%27t_afford"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cwre.org/w/index.php?title=Myths/Obamacare/is_a_luxury_we_can%27t_afford&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-06-13T18:38:53Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.35.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://cwre.org/w/index.php?title=Myths/Obamacare/is_a_luxury_we_can%27t_afford&amp;diff=657&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Woozle: adaptation first draft</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://cwre.org/w/index.php?title=Myths/Obamacare/is_a_luxury_we_can%27t_afford&amp;diff=657&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2015-03-26T21:12:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;adaptation first draft&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{hdr/myth|Obamacare is a luxury we can't afford.}}&lt;br /&gt;
==Myth==&lt;br /&gt;
The argument seems to be that when the economy is tough, we should spend less money. Therefore Obamacare -- which must be expensive, right? -- is something we can't afford right now.&lt;br /&gt;
==Reality==&lt;br /&gt;
Leaving aside the austerity myth, this argument is based on several bits of misinformation and misperception &amp;amp;ndash; the most obvious of which is that Obamacare is expensive and will increase the deficit.&lt;br /&gt;
===The CBO Analysis===&lt;br /&gt;
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated the legislation would ''reduce'' the deficit by $143 billion over the first decade and by $1.2 trillion in the second decade.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Repeat''': Obamacare ''decreases'' the deficit. If you ''repeal'' it, you ''increase'' the deficit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you don't believe the CBO's analysis, who do you believe -- and why? Have they explained how the CBO's analysis is wrong?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even assuming that the CBO estimate is somehow inaccurate, if the GOP would just be willing to reinstate Reagan-era tax rates for those who ''can'' afford a little extra -- you know, that top 1% of earners who just got their tax cuts extended by that &amp;quot;socialist&amp;quot;, Obama -- any possible underestimate of the cost would be taken care of.&lt;br /&gt;
===Additional Effects===&lt;br /&gt;
The CBO analysis doesn't even take into account the expected economic benefits from having a healthier population -- a kind of &amp;quot;trickle down&amp;quot; that actually ''works'', unlike the Bush tax cuts.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even if your sole interest is seeing the insurance companies profit, Obamacare fills that need too: ''Forbes'' magazine [http://blogs.forbes.com/rickungar/2011/01/06/more-small-businesses-offering-health-care-to-employees-thanks-to-obamacare/ has observed] that insurance companies are seeing a boom in new policies, including many from small businesses which previously hadn't been able to offer insurance to their employees.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Gee, large ''and'' small businesses benefiting -- isn't that what Republicans are supposed to be in favor of?&lt;br /&gt;
===Links===&lt;br /&gt;
* '''2011-01-22''' [http://www.firstfocus.net/sites/default/files/StateCost_Dorn_0.pdf FirstFocus reports] that &amp;quot;A worst-case scenario [for the impact of the Affordable Care Act on state budgets] will thus see states realizing net budgetary savings of $40.6 billion during 2014-2019. In a best-case scenario, those gains will reach $131.9 billion.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
==Notes==&lt;br /&gt;
This was adapted from [[htwiki:User:Woozle/blog/2011-01-13 1110 Obamacare myth the first|the HypertWiki]].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Woozle</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>