Marketism - Revision history

Woozle: /* "rights" means "law enforcement is immoral" */ fixed typo

2015-03-25T20:19:13Z

"rights" means "law enforcement is immoral": fixed typo

Woozle: a couple of categories

2015-03-23T21:26:11Z

a couple of categories

Woozle: NAP

2015-03-21T22:36:01Z

NAP

Woozle: yet more definition subpages

2015-03-21T22:28:04Z

yet more definition subpages

Woozle: marketist terminology (2 so far)

2015-03-21T21:33:09Z

marketist terminology (2 so far)

Woozle: /* Questions */ another question

2015-03-21T19:21:55Z

Questions: another question

Woozle: related pages

2015-03-18T18:44:38Z

Woozle: post-move vocabulary revisions; more snark

2015-03-18T18:38:33Z

post-move vocabulary revisions; more snark

Woozle: post-move vocabulary revisions

2015-03-18T17:05:25Z

post-move vocabulary revisions

Woozle: Woozle moved page Free-marketism to Marketism: after much consideration, a rename seemed in order

2015-03-18T17:00:34Z

Woozle moved page Free-marketism to Marketism: after much consideration, a rename seemed in order

@@ Line 35: / Line 35: @@
 ===="rights" means "law enforcement is immoral"====
 # Get you to accept their definition of "rights", which is that they are [[natural rights|created by nature]] (not humans) and yet are undetectable to science. (Kind of like "God".)
-# Once you've accepted this, they get you to accept their (reasonable-sounding) list of what those (undetectable) rights are, because &lt;select arbitrary explanation from list and insert here&rt;.
+# Once you've accepted this, they get you to accept their (reasonable-sounding) list of what those (undetectable) rights are, because ''&lt;select arbitrary explanation from list and insert here&gt;''.
 # On the basis of that list of inalienable natural rights that you can't argue with because NATURE, they can then argue that taxation is theft and the use of force by governments to keep people from doing bad things is the Worst Thing Evar.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:26, 23 March 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	[[category:top]]
		+	[[category:isms]]
	[[Marketism]] is a [[issuepedia:marketism/religion\|faith-based]] political belief-system with a rich mythology and historical origins in 18th century liberal economic philosophy, from which it borrows authenticity while supporting a completely different goal. It has recently gained favor with the [[rentier class]] as a means of convincing the [[productive class]] to cooperate with their own subjugation.		[[Marketism]] is a [[issuepedia:marketism/religion\|faith-based]] political belief-system with a rich mythology and historical origins in 18th century liberal economic philosophy, from which it borrows authenticity while supporting a completely different goal. It has recently gained favor with the [[rentier class]] as a means of convincing the [[productive class]] to cooperate with their own subjugation.
	===Related===		===Related===

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 * [[/initiation of violence]]
 * [[/natural right]]
 * [[/obligation]]: see [[/negative obligation]], [[/positive obligation]]
 * [[/property]]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 Marketist terminology:
 * [[/discipline of constant dealings]]
 * [[/initiation of violence]]
 ===Questions===
 Some questions for marketeers:

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 * [[Freedom to become enslaved]]
 * The "{{l/sub|right to work|misnomers}}"
 ===Questions===
 Some questions for marketeers:

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 # Do you dispute that the need for employment in order to survive is a [[economic coercion|form of coercion]]?
 #* <small>These two points have been raised [https://plus.google.com/b/109185295204629063487/+RobertHirschSandor/posts/KeCk3WiGv9M here]; no answer as of 2015-02-14.</small>
 ===Techniques===

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[Marketism]] is a [[issuepedia:marketism/religion|faith-based]] political belief-system with a rich mythology and historical origins in 18th century liberal economic philosophy, from which it borrows authenticity while supporting a completely different goal. It has recently gained favor with the [[rentier class]] as a means of convincing the [[productive class]] to cooperate with their own subjugation.
 ===Questions===
 Some questions for marketeers:
-# Do you agree that voluntarism has some issues that need to be resolved?
+# Do you agree that your philosophy has some issues that need to be resolved?
 # Do you agree that government sometimes "gets it right", i.e. sometimes intentionally does good things?
-# Do you agree that some amount of coercion is necessary in any society?
+# Do you agree that some amount of {{l/sub|coercion}} is necessary in any society?
 ## How do you resolve the discrepancy between the idea of a "purely voluntary" society and the idea that it would be okay for private individuals to hire a police force?
-# Do you dispute that property rights are a form of coercion?
+# Do you dispute that [[property rights]] are a form of coercion?
-# Do you dispute that the need for employment in order to survive is a form of coercion?
+# Do you dispute that the need for employment in order to survive is a [[economic coercion|form of coercion]]?
 #* <small>These two points have been raised [https://plus.google.com/b/109185295204629063487/+RobertHirschSandor/posts/KeCk3WiGv9M here]; no answer as of 2015-02-14.</small>
 ===Techniques===
 ===="rights" means "law enforcement is immoral"====
-# Get you to accept their definition of "rights", which is that they are created by nature (not humans) and yet are undetectable to science. (Kind of like "God".)
+# Get you to accept their definition of "rights", which is that they are [[natural rights|created by nature]] (not humans) and yet are undetectable to science. (Kind of like "God".)
 # Once you've accepted this, they get you to accept their (reasonable-sounding) list of what those (undetectable) rights are, because &lt;select arbitrary explanation from list and insert here&rt;.
 # On the basis of that list of inalienable natural rights that you can't argue with because NATURE, they can then argue that taxation is theft and the use of force by governments to keep people from doing bad things is the Worst Thing Evar.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-[[Free-marketism]] is a loose aggregation of beliefs that generally [[anti-governmentism|oppose government]] and favor private enterprise, almost always advocating for [[small government|"smaller" government]] or at least less government regulation of private business ([[laissez-faire]] economics). Some advocate for the [[anarcho-capitalism|abolishment of government altogether]].
+[[Marketism]] is a loose aggregation of beliefs that generally [[anti-governmentism|oppose government]] and favor private enterprise, almost always advocating for [[small government|"smaller" government]] or at least less government regulation of private business ([[laissez-faire]] economics). Some advocate for the [[anarcho-capitalism|abolishment of government altogether]].
 ==Terminology==
-An adherent of [[free marketism]] is called a [[free-marketeer]] or [[free-marketist]].
+* Marketism is short for [[market fundamentalism]] or [[free market fundamentalism]], and is also known as [[free-marketism]] and [[market extremism]].
 ===Questions===
-Some questions for free-marketeers:
+Some questions for marketeers:
 # Do you agree that voluntarism has some issues that need to be resolved?
 # Do you agree that government sometimes "gets it right", i.e. takes actions whose effects are primarily (and intentionally) beneficial?
@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 ==Hypothesis==
-Free-marketist philosophy may be summed up as "In the absence of government, we will be safe from people who want to exploit others because we can freely form organizations to protect ourselves from those of ill intent. These organizations are different from governments because they will do things the way I think things ought to be done, and because I will, of course, be among the leaders." (h/t Jeremy Nixon in [https://plus.google.com/u/0/102282887764745350285/posts/N9sqQzHfhJn this thread])
+Marketist philosophy may be summed up as "In the absence of government, we will be safe from people who want to exploit others because we can freely form organizations to protect ourselves from those of ill intent. These organizations are different from governments because they will do things the way I think things ought to be done, and because I will, of course, be among the leaders." (h/t Jeremy Nixon in [https://plus.google.com/u/0/102282887764745350285/posts/N9sqQzHfhJn this thread])
 ==Links==
 ===Reference===
 * {{issuepedia}}

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:00, 18 March 2015
(No difference)