In progress/work ethic obsession - Revision history

Woozle: "about"... this is almost an article

2015-01-09T21:07:49Z

"about"... this is almost an article

Woozle: two more links from another page

2015-01-09T20:59:25Z

two more links from another page

Woozle: Created page with "==Examples== * '''2015-01-09''' [https://plus.google.com/u/0/117800110659124563147/posts/gKqgGjdXsma Jeffrey Spangler], comment in response to the idea that free education is..."

2015-01-09T20:56:00Z

Created page with "==Examples== * '''2015-01-09''' [https://plus.google.com/u/0/117800110659124563147/posts/gKqgGjdXsma Jeffrey Spangler], comment in response to the idea that free education is..."

New page

==Examples==
* '''2015-01-09''' [https://plus.google.com/u/0/117800110659124563147/posts/gKqgGjdXsma Jeffrey Spangler], comment in response to the idea that free education is a good thing: "maybe some of us dumb asses still believe in working for what we have and don't have an entitlement mentally."

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:07, 9 January 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	==About==
		+	[[Conservatroll]]s often seem obsessed with the idea that ''people must work'', by which they usually mean ''people must be employed'', in order to be worth anything – and thus argue against liberal policies that offer support to the unemployed or give people more choice in whether or not to be employed, painting the supporters of such policies as having "entitlement".
		+
		+	Even if the premise were true, it's primarily a {{l/ip\|soldier argument}} for the [[Republican Party\|Republican]] agenda, as they also tend to support [[Myths/Republicans are better at creating jobs than Democrats\|Republican policies that put people ''out'' of work]].
		+
	==Examples==		==Examples==
	===mass media===		===mass media===

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:59, 9 January 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Examples==		==Examples==
		+	===mass media===
		+	* '''2014-02-05''' [http://www.mediamatters.org/embed/clips/2014/02/05/33937/fnc-hn-20140205-scottcbo Fox News: Happening Now (host: Jon Scott)] (video): summarized [http://www.mediamatters.org/research/2014/02/05/right-wing-media-hate-that-obamacare-reduces-ec/197938 here] as ''claiming that the Obama Administration was trying to "sell this as somehow a good thing." Scott went on to ask guest Douglas Holtz-Eakin "can you see in any way that this is a good thing if two million fewer Americans are working in a few years?"''
		+	* '''2014-02-05''' [http://www.mediamatters.org/embed/clips/2014/02/05/33936/fnc-ff-20140205-varneycbo Fox News: Fox & Friends (Stuart Varney)] (video): summarized [http://www.mediamatters.org/research/2014/02/05/right-wing-media-hate-that-obamacare-reduces-ec/197938 here] as ''claiming that the reduction in workers' hours was "a complete reversal of the American work ethic" and that the law has "shifted the whole concept of work."''
		+	===social media===
	* '''2015-01-09''' [https://plus.google.com/u/0/117800110659124563147/posts/gKqgGjdXsma Jeffrey Spangler], comment in response to the idea that free education is a good thing: "maybe some of us dumb asses still believe in working for what we have and don't have an entitlement mentally."		* '''2015-01-09''' [https://plus.google.com/u/0/117800110659124563147/posts/gKqgGjdXsma Jeffrey Spangler], comment in response to the idea that free education is a good thing: "maybe some of us dumb asses still believe in working for what we have and don't have an entitlement mentally."